OSCE FOR MANDATORY REPORTING
PERFORMANCE RATING SCALE
Please circle the number corresponding to the candidate’s performance.
- APPROACH TO CHILD MALTREATMENT ISSUE
Q.1 How do participants discuss the concerns of child maltreatment with the client?
|
Does not discuss child maltreatment issue. |
Discusses child maltreatment issue in passing and does not pursue a line of questioning. |
Discusses some aspects of child maltreatment issue but moves prematurely to other topics or their inquiry is ineffective. |
Discusses child maltreatment issue but may move to other topics. Attempts are effectively made to approach the topic again. |
Directly discusses child maltreatment issue firmly, clearly, and thoroughly in a focused approach. |
||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
||||
Q.2 How do participants discuss the duty to report?
|
Does not discuss duty to report with caregiver. |
Duty to report is discussed but unclear and vague. |
Discusses duty to report but moves prematurely to other topics. |
Discusses duty to report firmly and clearly. |
Discusses duty to report firmly, clearly, and emphatically. |
|||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
|
||||
- FOCUS ON RELATIONSHIP REPAIR
Q.3 How do participants maintain balance of content and process in the interview?
|
Exclusive focus of child maltreatment issue and gathering information. |
Overly focused on child maltreatment issue with minimal attention to the relationship. |
Moves too quickly from child maltreatment issue to relationship repair. |
Movement from child maltreatment issue to relationship is appropriate but some transitions rough and not always responsive to client concerns. |
Balance between child maltreatment issue and relationship repair. |
Not Applicable |
||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
N/A |
||||
Q.4 How do participants use strategies to maintain the relationship?
|
Does not use relationship repair strategies.
|
Uses relationship repair strategies but strategies are minimal or inappropriate for caregiver needs. |
Uses relationship repair strategies purposefully but in a mechanical fashion or is limited to one strategy. |
Uses some relationship repair strategies purposefully with some display of empathy and warmth. |
Uses multiple relationship repair strategies purposefully, empathetically, and effectively based on caregiver needs. |
Not Applicable |
||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
N/A |
||||
Q5. How do participants manage affect (i.e., tears, anger, fear, protest) related to the duty to report?
|
Does not acknowledge client affect. |
Appears overwhelmed by client affect. |
Acknowledges affect but mechanically or in a blaming manner. |
Acknowledges affect through validation and empathy. |
Acknowledges affect through validation and empathy while asserting the need to report. |
Not Applicable |
||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
N/A |
||||
- CONDUCTS A SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT
Q.6 What factors do participants include in an eco-systemic assessment of child maltreatment issue (i.e. nuclear family, extended family, neighbourhood, friends, employment, school, housing, medical, immigration status, religion)?
|
Comprehensive systemic inquiry missing. |
Struggles to focus on more than one system. |
Identifies the obvious systems but no connection between them. |
Identifies all relevant systems and some connection between problem and systems. |
Complete systemic assessment with depths of linkages between them. |
||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
||||
- DEMONSTRATES CULTURAL COMPETENCE
How do participants include culture, race, age, or ability?
Q.7 Based on your impression of the participant’s performance, this participant demonstrated competence at the level of…
|
Ignores the impact of culture on the child maltreatment issue. |
Inconsistent recognition of the cultural impact on child maltreatment. |
Displays some interest but exploration is limited to selected aspects of culture. |
Frequent attempts to recognize the impact of culture on child maltreatment. |
Consistent recognition and in-depth exploration of culture and child maltreatment. |
||||||||
|
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
2.5 |
3 |
3.5 |
4 |
4.5 |
5 |
||||
- OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF MANAGING A SUSPICION OF CHILD MALTREATMENT AND USING RELATIONSHIP REPAIR STRATEGIES
Q.8 Based on your impression of the participant’s performance, this participant demonstrated competence at the level of…
|
No exploration of suspicion of child maltreatment issue or blames the caregiver and further diminishes the relationship. |
Minimal attempts to explore child maltreatment issue and utilize relationship repair strategies. |
Some exploration of the child maltreatment issue, mentions duty to report in passing, and minimal use of relationship repair strategies. |
Generally consistent exploration of child maltreatment issue, discusses duty to report while also utilizing relationship repair strategies. |
Consistent and in-depth exploration of child maltreatment issue and duty to report balanced with effective use of relationship repair strategies. |
||||||||
|
1-Poor |
1.5 |
2-Requires Training |
2.5 |
3-Minimal Competence |
3.5 |
4-Good |
4.5 |
5-Excellent |
||||